subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Fri, Nov 20 2009 

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Photos


Under the watchful eyes of Coleman challenger Paul Creighton and Franken challenger Linda Severin, election official Kay Schuch (center) sorts through ballots at a recount at the Sibley County Courthouse in Gaylord. A recount began Wednesday in Minnesota in the U.S. Senate race between incumbent Republican Senator Norm Coleman and challenger Al Franken.
John Cross / The Free Press


Published November 19, 2008 11:20 pm - The hotly-constested race between candidates Al Franken and Norm Coleman is entering part two: The recount.

Senate recount begins in earnest
Candidates hold ground during second look

By Mark Fischenich
Free Press Staff Writer

GAYLORD

For most of Wednesday, the U.S. Senate race recount in Sibley County operated smoothly, seemed to prove that the ballot-counting machines had performed flawlessly on election night and provided one additional vote for Democrat Al Franken.

But one of the last townships counted provided a one-vote flip — from Franken to Republican Sen. Norm Coleman — and there was no ready explanation for why it happened.

That switch eliminated the one-vote pick-up Franken received when the manual recount spotted a Gaylord ballot where the voter had put a check-mark to the right of the Democrat’s name rather than filling in the oval to the left. The counting machine missed that vote and the voter’s presidential preference, which was also made with a check mark outside the oval.

Farther down the ballot, the voter filled in the ovals as the ballots instruct.

“He must have decided to read the instructions (part-way through),” said Aaron Scharpe, a Sibley County deputy auditor.

To gain ground — albeit a single vote — probably would have been a victory for Franken considering Sibley County gave him just 28 percent of its Senate votes on election night. Franken went into the start of the statewide recount Wednesday trailing Coleman by 215 votes out of nearly 3 million cast.

Ultimately, though, the discovered Gaylord vote didn’t reduce Franken’s deficit to 214.

The change in Dryden Township gave Coleman 68 votes rather than the 67 reported previously, and Franken 37 instead of 38. So that means the final count for Sibley County will most likely provide Coleman with one additional total vote, with Franken staying even because the added vote in Gaylord was offset by the lost vote in Dryden Township.

There were three challenges to the vote determinations by election officials — two by a Coleman representative disputing a pair of Franken votes and one by a Franken representative of a Coleman vote. In all three cases, the voter intent as defined under state law appeared to be clear, and the challengers at times had trouble explaining specifically why they were challenging the ballots.

The three ballots were set aside and will be examined next month by the State Canvassing Board, a group of judges and Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, for a final decision. If the challenges are judged to be without merit, the final totals in Sibley County will be 3,499 votes for Coleman and 2,158 for Franken. The unexplained change in Dryden Township clearly vexed Sibley County Auditor Lisa Pfarr, who asked the lead representatives of the two campaigns if they’d agree to one more count of the township votes.

“I want to make sure this number is right,” Pfarr told them.

But by the time Pfarr was aware of the change, the recount team that had handled the Dryden count had sealed the envelope.

The Coleman representative sought advice from the campaign’s recount lawyers, who responded that they would agree to reopen the envelope only if Ritchie consented. Pfarr made a call to Ritchie’s office, and she was told to not reopen the Dryden count.

“Status quo,” Pfarr announced. “We will not be recounting.”

The count of the township, like all others in Sibley County, had been watched closely by representatives of both campaigns. Neither challenged any ballots cast in the township, and the ballots were counted by two separate election workers.



print this story    email this story   
Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.
Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.






autoconx

Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Premier Guide

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index