Published February 25, 2007 12:22 am - After years of unfettered growth, Mankato’s entertainment district hasn’t been able to solve crime and nuisance problems within its bars and in surrounding neighborhoods.
Talk about time out
Yearlong moratorium would freeze liquor licenses, allow for study
By Dan Linehan
The Free Press
MANKATO
—
After years of unfettered growth, Mankato’s entertainment district hasn’t been able to solve crime and nuisance problems within its bars and in surrounding neighborhoods.
And added enforcement would only target the effects of that growth, not the structural and operational issues that lead to it.
The city’s staff doesn’t yet have all the answers, but City Manager Pat Hentges says a time out would freeze the situation, providing a baseline for a study while preventing problems from worsening. It’s called a moratorium, and it means that the city would keep the number of liquor licenses stable for up to one year.
Hentges compared the situation to secondhand smoke, an issue that received a lot of attention and, eventually, City Council action. Excessive drinking, he argues, levies a much higher cost on society than secondhand smoke.
Hentges said the first step on that path would be a moratorium.
The City Council will hold a public hearing on the issue on Monday evening. It could decide to vote then on a moratorium or wait on it. In late 2005, the council deadlocked 3 to 3 on the moratorium. But two of the council people who voted “no” on the issue have left the council.
Legal muscle
Problem is, the city can’t deny liquor licenses just because of a perceived over-saturation of bars downtown. It needs to develop standards to justify changes to the licensing process and to the ways bars are regulated.
Those changes could take many forms.
The current non-restaurant liquor license, which costs about $6,000 for seven-day operation, could be split up into several categories with different pricing.
Hentges said that could mean that restaurants that earn more income from food would pay less for a permit while establishments that rely on liquor would pay more. That’s because bars tend to generate more problems than restaurants.
Minneapolis has a similar system, though its licensing structure relies on live entertainment, rather than a comparison of food and liquor sales, said Grant Wilson, the city’s manager of business licensing.
The cheapest license, Class E, allows no live acts and costs $5,677. That goes to Class A, which allows unlimited live entertainment, including adult acts, and costs $9,413.
“It was proven that there were more police calls at establishments with live entertainment than those that didn’t,” Wilson said.
There’s also a zoning rule that forces bars near neighborhoods to derive 60 percent of their income from food. Like Hentges, he says such establishments create fewer problems than their liquor-fueled cousins.